I have generated keys and certificates by OpenSSL with the secp256k1, run rke
version v1.2.8 from the Rancher Kubernetes Engine (RKE), and got the following error:
FATA[0000] Failed to read certificates from dir [/home/max/cluster_certs]: failed to read certificate [kube-apiserver-requestheader-ca.pem]: x509: unsupported elliptic curve
kubectl version
:
Client Version: version.Info{Major:"1", Minor:"21", GitVersion:"v1.21.1", GitCommit:"5e58841cce77d4bc13713ad2b91fa0d961e69192", GitTreeState:"clean", BuildDate:"2021-05-12T14:18:45Z", GoVersion:"go1.16.4", Compiler:"gc", Platform:"linux/amd64"}
I have generated the root CA key and certificate the following way:
openssl ecparam -name secp256k1 -genkey -noout -out ca-pvt.pem -rand random.bin -writerand random.bin
openssl req -config .\openssl.cnf -x509 -sha256 -new -nodes -key ca-pvt.pem -days 10227 -out ca-cert.cer -rand random.bin -writerand random.bin
Then I used it to sign the CSRs generated by rke cert generate-csr
from my Kubernetes Rancher cluster.yml
.
The command line to approve a CSR was the following:
openssl ca -config openssl.cnf -batch -in %1 -out %2 -create_serial -notext -rand random.bin -writerand random.bin
Which curves are supported today by Kubernetes for the certificates if secp256k1
yields the x509: unsupported elliptic curve
error message?
I have also tried the prime256v1
, also known as secp256r1
. It progressed further comparing to secp256k1
, but still got an error.
With prime256v1
, RKE did not complain x509: unsupported elliptic curve
.
Instead, it gave an error panic: interface conversion: interface {} is *ecdsa.PrivateKey, not *rsa.PrivateKey
. Here is the full error message:
Here is the full error message:
DEBU[0000] Certificate file [./cluster_certs/kube-apiserver-requestheader-ca.pem] content is greater than 0
panic: interface conversion: interface {} is *ecdsa.PrivateKey, not *rsa.PrivateKey
goroutine 1 [running]: github.com/rancher/rke/pki.getKeyFromFile(0x7ffe6294c74e, 0xf, 0xc00105cb10, 0x27, 0x8, 0xc00105cb10, 0x27)
/go/src/github.com/rancher/rke/pki/util.go:656 +0x212
Which curves are supported today by Kubernetes for the certificates if
secp256k1
yields thex509: unsupported elliptic curve
error message?
To try to answer this question I will look directly at the source code. You can find there lines, that gives an error unsupported elliptic curve
:
case *ecdsa.PublicKey:
publicKeyBytes = elliptic.Marshal(pub.Curve, pub.X, pub.Y)
oid, ok := oidFromNamedCurve(pub.Curve)
if !ok {
return nil, pkix.AlgorithmIdentifier{}, errors.New("x509: unsupported elliptic curve")
}
There are two functions here that are responsible for processing the curve:
// Marshal converts a point on the curve into the uncompressed form specified in
// section 4.3.6 of ANSI X9.62.
func Marshal(curve Curve, x, y *big.Int) []byte {
byteLen := (curve.Params().BitSize + 7) / 8
ret := make([]byte, 1+2*byteLen)
ret[0] = 4 // uncompressed point
x.FillBytes(ret[1 : 1+byteLen])
y.FillBytes(ret[1+byteLen : 1+2*byteLen])
return ret
}
// OIDFromNamedCurve returns the OID used to specify the use of the given
// elliptic curve.
func OIDFromNamedCurve(curve elliptic.Curve) (asn1.ObjectIdentifier, bool) {
switch curve {
case elliptic.P224():
return OIDNamedCurveP224, true
case elliptic.P256():
return OIDNamedCurveP256, true
case elliptic.P384():
return OIDNamedCurveP384, true
case elliptic.P521():
return OIDNamedCurveP521, true
case secp192r1():
return OIDNamedCurveP192, true
}
return nil, false
}
The final answer is therefore in the switch. Supported elliptic curves are:
You need to change your curve to secp256r1
. The main difference is that secp256k1
is a Koblitz curve, while secp256r1
is not. Koblitz curves are known to be a few bits weaker than other curves.
OpenSSL supports "secp256r1", it is just called "prime256v1". Check section 2.1.1.1 in RFC 5480, where the "secp192r1" curve is called "prime192v1" and the "secp256r1" curve is called "prime256v1".