What is the difference between having multiple namespace and multiple cluster in Kubernetes

6/28/2020

I am a beginner and learning about Kubernetes.

As per my understanding, namespace is a virtual cluster backed by the same physical cluster.

In which usecases do we go for separate physical Kubernetes cluster?

What are the main resources that can be saved by opting for namespace instead of physical Kubernetes cluster? (Kubernetes objects present in one namespace of the physical cluster can be shared by all other namespaces, like the ones in kube-system? And are the nodes in the physical Kubernetes cluster shared by all the namespaces but it is not possible to share nodes between multiple physical Kubernetes clusters?)

-- firstpostcommenter
kubernetes

2 Answers

6/28/2020

A namespace isn't a "virtual cluster" in any meaningful way; it's just a way to group together resources. For instance, these Services are different because they're in different namespaces:

<!-- language: lang-sh -->
kubectl describe service --namespace n1 foo
kubectl describe service --namespace n2 foo

But a service in n1 can make a call to foo.n2.svc.cluster.local without doing any special setup.

A namespace is a natural boundary for Kubernetes RBAC settings. If one object directly references another (e.g., a pod mounts a persistent volume claim or gets environment variables from a config map) they generally must be in the same namespace.

In an actual cluster, the nodes are shared. A given node can run any pod from any namespace (unless that's specifically configured at the pod level); kubectl describe node will show this. If a pod makes very heavy use of some resource (CPU, memory, disk I/O) this can impact other pods running on the same node. That completely ignores namespace boundaries.

You want different clusters when you want things to actually be separated: when a service in one environment shouldn't be able to call a service in a different environment, when cluster-level resources like NodePort services need to be separated, if you have different policies around things like PersistentVolume allocation.

Sharing a cluster means that you need fewer copies of some cluster-global processes (the Kubernetes core, service meshes like Istio) and you can share nodes. That could result in better utilization of large nodes.

You might, for example, separate your test and production environments into separate clusters. These would have different external-DNS settings, separate ingress controllers, and separate node pools. You couldn't accidentally send requests into the test environment from outside, and a load test on the test environment wouldn't impact the production environment.

-- David Maze
Source: StackOverflow

6/28/2020

Generally a separate physical cluster is necessary

  1. To meet compliance and security standards such as PCI DSS, HIPPA etc.
  2. To provide dedicated physical resources to critical workloads.
  3. To separate different environments such as DEV, TEST, PROD

A multi tenant cluster shared by many tenants using their own namespace is useful for saving cost. Namespace separation is logical where the resources of all namespaces still reside in same ETCD storage but with different keys. This is not a problem in separate dedicated physical cluster because in that case the cluster will have separate ETCD as well.

Access to resources across namespaces is controlled by RBAC via kubernetes API Server. But you can access everything from all namespaces if you get access to ETCD directly bypassing the API Server.

You need to put lot of best practices and protection in a multi tenant cluster so that tenants from different namespaces do not step on each other toes. This not that much necessary in a separate dedicated physical cluster.

-- Arghya Sadhu
Source: StackOverflow