I have the following setup.
My Vert.x verticles are clustered with Hazelcast and deployed on Kubernetes cluster with following network info:
------------------------------------------------
TCP/IP NETWORK INFORMATION
------------------------------------------------
IP Entered = ..................: 10.60.0.0
CIDR = ........................: /14
Netmask = .....................: 255.252.0.0
Netmask (hex) = ...............: 0xfffc0000
Wildcard Bits = ...............: 0.3.255.255
------------------------------------------------
Network Address = .............: 10.60.0.0
Broadcast Address = ...........: 10.63.255.255
Usable IP Addresses = .........: 262,142
First Usable IP Address = .....: 10.60.0.1
Last Usable IP Address = ......: 10.63.255.254
The Hazelcast's cluster.xml
has the following section:
<join>
<multicast enabled="true">
<multicast-group>224.2.2.3</multicast-group>
<multicast-port>54327</multicast-port>
</multicast>
</join>
All seems fine. When I start verticles in pods, I get the output (abbreviated):
>kubectl get pods --namespace develop -o wide
READY STATUS RESTARTS AGE IP
1/1 Running 0 52m 10.60.4.18
1/1 Running 0 4m 10.60.6.19
1/1 Running 0 4m 10.60.1.16
1/1 Running 0 4m 10.60.1.18
1/1 Running 0 4m 10.60.6.18
1/1 Running 0 4m 10.60.1.17
1/1 Running 0 4m 10.60.4.23
1/1 Running 0 8m 10.60.6.17
1/1 Running 0 4m 10.60.4.22
1/1 Running 0 4m 10.60.4.21
1/1 Running 0 4m 10.60.6.20
1/1 Running 0 5d 10.60.4.9
The problem is, that the clusters are groupped not by the group name specified, but rather by the 3rd number of the ip address. So, I'm getting a cluster of:
masterAddress=[10.60.1.17]:5701
Members[
[10.60.1.17]:5701
[10.60.1.16]:5701
[10.60.1.18]:5701]]
then 5 members for "cluster" 10.60.4.*
, 4 members for 10.60.6.*
and so on and they are not merging...
What am I missing?
TIA
Hazelcast has a dedicated plugin for the discovery in Kubernetes. Please check: hazelcast-kubernetes.
Mutlicast may or may not work, since it depends on the underlying network. In my experience on GKE, it sometimes works, sometimes it doesn't. That is why multicast-based discovery is never recommended for Kubernetes.
Resources: